protecting the bottom hook, and the high wrist position when attacking the guillotine. Verbalized some things that I'd thought myself, but hadn't heard anyone say - e.g.He verbalizes certain cues for different positions that I find very useful (e.g. There are a couple things I picked up from the sets: I also liked the Sakuraba style attacks at the end - they might not be the highest percentage finishes, but they're damn fun. If I was new to BJJ then I would have been very impressed with the concepts (e.g. If you have some experience then conceptually it's nothing too new. Think my finishing percentage has gone up, and the elbow across detail on the RNC was really good. Liked the back one, but he repeated himself a lot. Didn't touch on the Anaconda/Darce game very much at all. I thought the front headlock one was really light. I've watched the Back, Kimura, and Front Headlock ones. However, I can understand why he annoys so many people. Not so with Danaher, I haven't drilled any of the details I've learned in his instructionals but I've been hitting them in live rolls from memory because I can hear him in my head. I can almost never recall the details of a new technique unless I've drilled it numerous times.

I am not super talented when it comes to BJJ. A big positive, for me, with regard to his teaching style is that it seems to stay in my head without drilling.

I find that I can watch the videos 25% faster than normal without losing any of the details. VLC has a playback speed slider bar where you can finely adjust the speed. My solution was to download the digital copies from BJJ Fanatics and watch them on VLC Player. Much has been said about Danaher's teaching style. My armbars are tighter, with a much higher degree of control that offers a much smaller opportunity for escape than before. I went from not even attempting armbars outside of drilling a month ago to hitting them on longtime blue belts. With the latter, I felt like my terrible flexibility meant I was ever only going to hit that technique on white belts. With the former I always felt too light and off balance - not in control. The armbar series for me was a godsend My s-mount armbar had always been trash prior to this series and my armbar from the guard was laughable in my opinion. The triangle series greatly improved my entries into the triangle and has me hitting them a few times a month now whereas before the best I could hope for was getting stacked. However, my armbar and triangle finishes have gone way up since watching these two series. However, that said, I still do not get the back as often as I'd like.

The Back Attack series changed the way I think about about the back and demonstrated, to me anyway, many details about control that I hadn't considered. It's hard to say which one helped the most.

John danaher torrents